THEA 142: Development of Dramatic Art I

A discussion of the origins and transformations of primarily Western theatre from its origins to the late 18th century, through texts, artists, and theorists.

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

My History with Theatre History

Theatre history is one of my weaker points when it comes to the dramatic arts. I do find it interesting, but I personally would rather watch plays than read about them. This is not to say that I find the history of theatre boring or unimportant; I actually think it is a crucial and essential part of theatre. Theatre has been around as an outlet for people to confide in for centuries. To better understand what makes a good actor or a good play or director or whatever, the knowledge of what past plays work (and why) helps a great deal.

Forgive my digression. To restate, I do not know much about theatre history other than that from my English classes. I did participate in Academic Decathlon, so I will be able to recognize some plays and playwrights during the Renaissance era. Shakespeare interests me greatly, of course. I find his tragedies to be interesting, but I am in love with his other works. His epics. Henry V is the perfect example. I have always wanted to use the famous monoluge of "Once more unto the breach dear friends" in an audition, but the opportunity has never arissen.

All in all, I hope to gain an overall knowledge of the trends and patterns of theatre. I want to be able to understand why certain plays were written so I can also get into the heads of the characters more thoroughly.

1 Comments:

At 7:46 PM, Blogger Layne said...

5. I agree completely about the importance of understanding the history of theatre. I used to think history classes in school were boring and useless. Now, I believe that only by understanding the past can we accurately address the present or future. That is to say that we can gain amazing perspective on modern plays by studying how it developed from ancient theatre.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home